Rising gas prices used to be big news, but not so these days. Although the national average climbed to $3.56 on Feb. 20, setting a February record after going up nearly a month straight, there was far less coverage than in 2008. Broadcast networks repeatedly covered the rise under the Bush presidency. Gas prices bounced around eventually reaching $3.56-a-gallon on April 24, 2008.
The Business and Media Institute analyzed broadcast network news references to gas or fuel prices between Jan. 20 and Feb. 20, 2012 and from March 24 and April 24, 2008. BMI found that in the 2008 period there were more than 4 times as many gas prices stories, news briefs or news headlines on ABC, CBS and NBC as there were in 2012 (97 to 21).
Coverage during the time periods differed not only in quantity, but in tone as well. During Bush’s tenure, gas prices were a huge economic threat and cause of suffering. The networks also used the high gas prices to attack the administration. In 2012, the networks aired mostly matter-of-fact stories on the rising gas prices, and worried primarily that they would hinder the economic recovery, not that they are making people suffer.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (30)
During Bush’s tenure, gas prices were a huge economic threat and cause of suffering. The networks also used the high gas prices to attack the administration.
Okay, so how do we spin this to make it all "Bush's Fault"?
Not even a murmur about windfall profit taxes or investigations into price fixing. I guess it's all okay if we have $5.00 a gallon gas by Memorial Day weekend....
- 3 votes
Don't you think it's a little bit early in this run-up to say the coverage is unbalanced? The higher the price goes, believe me, there'll be more stories - many more.
To me it already seems like there's a lot.
I think both under Bush and Obama the story missed by the media is the role of speculators - some of them major banks - in the run-up of gas prices.
- 3 votes
Don't you think it's a little bit early in this run-up to say the coverage is unbalanced?
From the article quoted above:
The Business and Media Institute analyzed broadcast network news references to gas or fuel prices between Jan. 20 and Feb. 20, 2012 and from March 24 and April 24, 2008. BMI found that in the 2008 period there were more than 4 times as many gas prices stories, news briefs or news headlines on ABC, CBS and NBC as there were in 2012 (97 to 21).
So you would have us wait until March or should the coverage start when the prices rise? In 2008 it wasn't until March that the prices spiked that high while in 2012, they already are above those levels in February.
- 4 votes
Windfall profits' taxes and price fixing? Yeah, the republicans will get right on that. As soon as they get the birth control crap under control.
- 4 votes
Rising gas prices used to be big news, but not so these days.
Yeah it's funny how "news" works... when something happens every week, week in and week out such as gas prices rising, after about a decade that story no longer attracts viewers which are needed for the stations to sell advertising and bring in revenue.
I think they've achieved about the right balance on coverage. I'm sure there will be more if (when?) the price hits an average of $4 a gallon nationwide and every 10 cent per gallon increment above that.
Bottom line, the timing couldn't be worse for Team Obama '12. If the spike causes the economy to collapse (again) all bets are off on the President's reelection (unless Republicans pick Santorum as their nominee ) !!
- 1 vote
Another fact is that in 2008 the nation had never seen such high prices, now we have been broken into them. I can see another collapse after viewing/reading some things around planet Earth. Yes thank you CK, some of it is your own newsvine. Little information on Greece and 80k people that stormed their govt. Italy is in as bad of shape. Central Banks are marching to the tune, taking over countries and getting rid of their own executive bankers. 15 trillion distributed to 20 British banks, corporations heisting American workers pension funds. And of unindustrious Wal-Street bubble of 13k. Nope Americans won't be able to function with gas prices as high as they are going to get. I know a couple that spends as much on gas for the two of them to work that is more than a mortgage payment. How many couples do you know that do the same? And gas isn't even $5 a gallon yet.
- 1 vote
Newsflash: Rising gas prices aren't newsworthy anymore. We've been there and done that. Over and over.
The media doesn't make a profit selling old news.
- 2 votes
So it really won't crush the fragile economy like they said in '08? It really isn't the Presidents fault like we were told in '08?
And I thought it was only FOX that lied...
- 4 votes
If I remember back in '08 it was Pres. Bushes' fault because HE was an oil man and the big oil was in his pockets.
Now the media and NPR are blaming refinerys and States clean air regs as they shift to summer blends and the refinery fire in California along with every thing else but the White House. And, the Keystone pipeline or the National oil reserve will not help lower prices.
Besides, Banks do not invest in speculation. It's the same people who speculated in wall street in 2000 and real estate in 2006 that do. Stop blaming faceless institutions as propaganda.
- 2 votes
Here is a spreadsheet showing who was speculating in 2008.
Please note the abundance of banks on this list.
It's also interesting to note how much Koch was involved.
BTW, oil speculating costs America an estimated $800,000,000 a year.
- 2 votes
Susan-649485, #2.3;
Please note the abundance of banks on this list.
Yes banks are listed. They are managers of money market funds, IRAs, and other personal pension plans for individual depositors who expect a higher return on their money than savings acccounts. Banks get a fee for managing the funds not the return or loss derived from the investment.
They rent office space for stock brockers who have a licence to deal with a stock brokerage firm that has a seat on the stock exchanges and is the only person who can buy and sell stock, bonds, and futures contracts.
Oil is sold on the futures markets as contracts for delivery many months in the future. Every sale/contract is as speculative as predicting the way the wind will blow in your back yard in 6 months and how many times you'll fill your vehicle to drive a few blocks to the grocery store.
But then, I'm not here to teach you economics. Just explaining it's not as simplistic as blaming banks unless you include everyone who owns or uses a vehicle and wants fuel on demand. The same was true with speculation of the hay and oats markets when horses were the norm and people worked for a dollar a day.
- 2 votes
I wasn't aware that there was anyone who was blaming solely banks. In fact I'm quite sure that no one is.
It is not true, however, to say that banks carry no blame at all.
- 1 vote
it's not as simplistic as blaming banks
Bull crap, the profits most American citizens are getting from their little pittance in investments are being eaten alive by the increase in every thing that factors into gas prices. The wealthy are the only ones making money. Our economics is going bust only to be picked up by the wealthy and the robbery of 2008 is still happening today.
- 2 votes
Maybe because gas was at $4.21 in 2008 when Bush was president, and it's lower that that now, 4 years later. Demand is lower, smart people are driving smaller cars.
Not for nothing, but when Clinton was president, a barrel of oil was under $17. With our oil whores Bush/Cheney it was around $95 or over a 550% increase.
- 3 votes
Did you read the whole article?
Although the time periods BMI analyzed were the same length and ended with the same national average price for gasoline, due to price fluctuations they were not identical. In 2008, prices rose from $3.26 to $3.56 in the month we examined. In 2012, prices were already higher ($3.38 on Jan. 20).
Prices are being forecasted to exceed the 2008 levels by Memorial Day. Upwards of $5-$6 per gallon by then.
- 3 votes
Coulda, woulda, shoulda.
If I had a dime for everything that was "gonna" happen after Obama became President, I could be his SuperPac today!!
- 2 votes
Yep me too. Still waiting for those lower gas prices now that the White House isn't in the pockets of the Big Oil.
- 3 votes
I see the sheep are still grazing. $100 Oil has been with us ever since Cheney-bush said Iraqi Oil would pay for the wars. Maybe that is the bribe by the money folk to permit war for profit. And OIL is the profit.
Have we forgotten about the alleged pipe line worker in Algeria who was killed by terrorists in 2007 that prompted a $.45 hike at US pumps? When pressed, nobody knew his name and the story quickly became eclipsed by another screen of smoke and mirrors.
Do you people really, in all honesty, believe OIL is worth $100 a barrel?
Get real folks. Its worth $10. The Money folk have stolen your testicles.
- 5 votes
Well, to be fair, the CEO of Exxon told congress that oil shouldn't be selling for more than $60 - $70 and he admitted that the rest of the cost was due to speculation.
Yes, it actually only does cost around $11 to produce a barrel but I don't think that includes the cost of shipping, storing, etc.
- 2 votes
No. When Cheney-bush took the oath, oil was trading at $14.45.
From the 1920s' through the late 60s', oil was around $2 a barrel. In the 70s' with deregulation and the beginnings of SSE the price began to rise.
Refined, shipped and stored? That is part of the business. Same as lumber. You buy the boards, cut them, assemble them, and you have a house, garage or a porch. Besides, the Oil Cartels have made more profit in the last ten years than they have in the fifty previous. Ever wonder where all that money ends up?
I changed my mind. Its worth $8! Big Oil is not your friend.
- 3 votes
LOL
All I know is that the profit isn't helping America, is it?
- 2 votes
Any of you ever heard of OPEC?
I owned a lease on a Service Station in '71. When gas was $0.40 a gal. until OPECs' oil embargo. I still had to pay the lease and employee wages with no gas to sell. What rationed gas was available went to brand run Stations and my loss of the business.
No President was involved. If you want to blame someone, blame the gang of oil producers who take the money and buy little things like Rockefeller Center and $million weddings for their darling little daughters. Blame all the taxes the Federal and local taxers take on every gal. of gas and the oil you use.
You want gas and oil, they want the taxes to expand the government.
- 2 votes
@Anthony: Did you ever see the movie "The Formula" starring George C. Scott?
Check out the last few minutes of the movie.
The OPEC thing is a ruse. OPEC does its banking through US Banking Cartels. So--------------------------OPEC is what? All OIL is traded is dollar$.
- 1 vote
barry-barry-libcon, #4.5;
Are you seriously using a movie made up in Hollywood as a fact? Good source. You believe everything in movies?
Oil is traded in dollars as is many other commodities because the Dollar is the most reliable currency in world trade and accepted in most Countries. We buy from them here and the money goes to N.Y. into vaults. When another Country buys here or from other Countries, the money is moved from one vault to another vault. Can you imagine Let me try that different. Do you imagine a boat load of currency traveling the oceans trading pallets of cash, also? Like the one in "Brewsters' Millions? ... 8>}
FACT; OPEC is not a myth or a ruse. US banks hold billion$ in foreign accounts for Countries world wide as do other banks the world over. The Treasury Dept. "estimates" that at least half the US Dollars circulating in other Countries is counterfeit and is another reason They keep dollars in US banks.
N.Korea held dollars in a S.Korean bank, where most of it was counterfeit When the US government confiscated that account some years ago.
Someone once said; "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you!"
Oh! and by the bye, If you think gas is high here? Try Canada, where it was over $2.00/liter or a tad over a quart the last time I was there.
Thank you for your response Anthony. But. Aircraft loaded with $100 bills are going to Iraq and Afghanland every day, and have been doing so since 2001.
And, OPEC is a ruse? Well, if it is not, what is it? And who controls OPEC?
In Canada, companies and individuals, Health Insurance is paid through gasoline taxes.
You question some Hollywood movies as being a fair barometer? So, I can only assume you believe in Supply Side Economics, Citizens United, WMD, and Mushroom Clouds over Chicago.
Forgive my cynicism, for I have seen these games before. I spent 16 months in Vietnam. Lost a few freinds and a cousin. And that excursion accomplished what?
barry-barry-libcon, #4.7;
And, OPEC is a ruse? Well, if it is not, what is it? And who controls OPEC?
OPEC is a group of representatives of oil producing Countries who set oil prices,production quotas, and how many wells for each member will be on line and now controls well prices for competion on the world market. When demand goes down they lower production to raise the price. When the prices go up, they laugh all the way to the bank and build another desert resort like a snow slop skiing arena in 130 degree weather.
I appreciate your service in the military and sorrow over the loss of friends, but that does not bestow wisdom on economics or apply to the price of gas.
- 1 vote
I distinctly remember purchasing gas over $4.00 a gallon when Bush was president. Depending upon where you live gas is already $4.00 a gallon and I am hearing stories from many different sources that gas is going to reach $5.00+ by Memorial Day, so I don't get where there's hardly ANY coverage regarding the high price of gas.
As long as the U.S. is an oil glut nation, we're going to always have pain-at-the pump news stories. President Obama is NOT responsible for the increase in gas prices. He is also not responsible if you have inclement weather tomorrow.
Either pay the price or don't. Bitching over the amount of coverage you believe one president received over another will NOT change the price at the pump. Get over it.
- 2 votes
Actually the amount of coverage of the price hikes and it being linked to the Administrations response to those hikes did an enormous job of lowering the pump prices. Why is that do you think?
Maybe it's because once the President starts getting blamed it makes his whole Party look bad, which spurs them into action. Just as under Bush we had rumblings of windfall profit taxes being assessed, investigations into price fixing being bandied about, Congressional inquiries, and murmurs of clamping down on speculation all comprised enough pressure upon the oil industry to clean up their act long enough for oil to more than halve its top price in very short time. Now when nothing actually came to fruition, they started in with the hiking of prices again.
This time though the hikes are coming faster over a shorter period of time than in the past. Instead of a couple of years of small hikes taking effect slowly allowing the economy to adjust, they are happening much more quickly and in bigger average amounts over a monthly basis than before.
Now the question is, "When will Obama goad Congress into acting? Before or after $5.00 a gallon gas crushes the small gains made by the economy?"
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



